Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Artigos

v. 2 n. 1 (2015): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito

La economía política del conocimiento jurídico

  • Daniel Bonilla
DOI
https://doi.org/10.19092/reed.v2i1.53
Enviado
janeiro 30, 2015
Publicado
2015-01-31

Resumo

La producción, intercambio y uso del conocimiento jurídico están sometidos a una economía política. Estos procesos están regidos por una serie de reglas y principios que determinan las condiciones de posibilidad para la creación, comercio y consumo de teoría, dogmática y prácticas jurídicas. Esta economía política, consecuentemente, no es neutral. Construye un sujeto de conocimiento específico que actúa dentro de un espacio y un tiempo particulares. Este escrito, por tanto, tiene un doble objetivo. Por un lado, busca describir y analizar el modelo de economía política que domina la imaginación jurídica contemporánea. En esta medida, busca examinar la estructura conceptual de lo que quisiera llamar el modelo del libre mercado de las ideas jurídicas. Por el otro lado, busca describir y analizar un modelo de economía política alternativo y periférico que explicaría de mejor manera las dinámicas reales que regulan la generación, tráfico y uso del conocimiento jurídico. Para conseguir este objetivo, el escrito hace explícitas las estructuras conceptuales que conforman el que quisiera llamar el modelo colonial de producción de conocimiento jurídico. El artículo, por ende, tiene como fin hacer explícitos los tipos de sujeto de producción de conocimiento jurídico al que los modelos dan lugar, así como la manera como imaginan el tiempo y el espacio en el que estos sujeto se sitúan. De igual forma, busca hacer explícitas las reglas y principios más precisos que determinan la manera como estos modelos imaginan la producción, intercambio y uso del saber legal. 

Referências

  1. Abu-Odeh, L. (2004). The Politics of (Mis)recognition: Islamic Law Pedagogy in American Academia. American Journal of Comparative Law, 52.
  2. Alejandro Madrazo, A. (2008). From Revelation to Creation: The Origins of Text and Doctrine in the Civil Law Tradition. Mexican Law Review, 1(1).
  3. Anghie, A. (2004). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Aparicio, M. (2011). Nuevo constitucionalismo, derechos y medio ambiente en las constituciones de Ecuador y Bolivia. Revista General de Derecho Público Comparado.
  5. Atienza, M. (2003). El sentido del derecho. Barcelona: Ariel.
  6. Balkin, J. (2011). Constitutional Redemption: Political Faith in an Unjust World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  7. Bensusán, G. (2007). La efectividad de la legislación laboral en América Latina, Instituto de Estudios Laborales. Organización Internacional del Trabajo. Disponible en http://www.ilo.org/public/spanish/bureau/inst/download/dp18107.pdf.
  8. Bergel, J. L. (1988). Principal Features and Methods of Codification. Louisiana Law Review, 48(5), 1073-1097.
  9. Bonilla, D. (2013a) Introduction, In D. Bonilla (Ed.), Constitutionalism of the Global South: The Three Activist Courts of India, South Africa and Colombia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Bonilla, D. (2013b). El formalismo jurídico, la educación jurídica y la práctica profesional del derecho en Latinoamérica In H. Olea (Ed.), Derecho y pueblo Mapuche. Universidad Diego Portales.
  11. Bonilla, D. (2013c). Legal Clinics in the Global North and South: Between Equality and Subordination. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 16(1).
  12. Bonnecase, J. (1944). La Escuela De La Exégesis En El Derecho Civil. México: Cajica.
  13. Boucher, D., & Kelly, P. (Eds.) (1994) The Social Contract from Hobbes to Rawls. New York: Routledge.
  14. Cappelleti, M., & Garth, B. (1996). El acceso a la justicia. La tendencia en el movimiento mundial para hacer efectivos los derechos, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  15. Clark, B. C. (1998). Political Economy: A Comparative Approach. Westport: Praeger.
  16. Coetzee, J. M. (2003). Esperando a los bárbaros. México: Random House Mondadori.
  17. Cummings, S. L. (2004). The Politics of Pro Bono. UCLA Law Review, 52, 1-149.
  18. Cummings, S. L., & Rhode, D. L. (2010). Managing Pro Bono: Doing Well by Doing Better. Fordham Law Review, 78(5), 2357-2442.
  19. David R., & Brierley, J. E. (1978). Major Legal Systems in the World Today. New York: Free Press.
  20. Davis, D. M. (2003). Constitutional Borrowing: The Influence of Legal Culture and Local History in the Reconstitution of Comparative Influence: The South African Experience. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1, 181-195.
  21. Dean, W. (2004). Pro Bono: A Professional and Ethical Obligation. New York Law Journal. Disponible en: http://www.probono.net/ny/ news/article.47740-Pro_Bono_A_Professional_and_Ethical_Obligation.
  22. Dewey, J. (1924). Logical Method and the Law. Cornell Law Quarterly, 10.
  23. Domingo, P., & Sieder, R. (2001). Rule of Law, in Latin America: The International Promotion of Judicial Reform 1. London: Institute of Latin American Studies.
  24. Dominguez, F. R., & Baert, P. (Eds.) (2000). The Politics of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
  25. Donnelly, J. (2003). Universal Human Rights In Theory And Practice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  26. Duce, M. (2008). Enseñando destrezas de litigación en procesos orales en la Universidad Diego Portales: experiencias y aprendizajes. Derecho y Democracia – 15 Cuadernos Unimetanos, 91-107.
  27. Dupré, L. (2004). The Enlightenment and the Intellectual Foundations of Modern Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  28. Dworkin, R. (1986). Law´s Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  29. Elster, J. (1998). Régimen de mayorías y derechos individuales, En De los Derechos Humanos: Las conferencias Oxford - Amnesty de 1993. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
  30. Epstein L., & Knight, J. (2003). Constitutional Borrowing and Nonborrowing. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1, 196-223 (2003).
  31. Esquirol, J. L. (1997). The Fictions of Latin American Law (Part I). Utah Law Review.
  32. Esquirol, J. L. (2003). Continuing Fictions of Latin American Law, Florida Law Review, 55.
  33. Esquirol, J. L. (2008). The Failed Law of Latin America. American Journal of Comparative Law, 56.
  34. Esquirol, J. L. (2009). Writing the Law of Latin America. George Washington International Law Review, 40.
  35. Esquirol, J. L. (2013). Legal Latin Americanism. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 16, 145-170.
  36. Fierro, H. F., & López, S. (2006). La educación jurídica en México, un panorama general. Estudios Jurídicos En Homenaje A Marta Morineau: Sistemas Jurídicos Contemporáneos, Derecho Comparado.
  37. Frank, J. (1933). Why Not a Clinical Lawyer-School? University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 81(8), 1932-1933.
  38. Friihling, H. (2000). From Dictatorship to Democracy: Law and Social Change in the Andean Region and the Southern Cone of South America. In M. McClymont, & S. Golub (Eds.), Many Roads To Justice: The Law-Related Work Of Ford Foundation Grantees Around The World.
  39. Gilbert, J. (2006). Indigenous Peoples' Land Rights under International Law: from victims to actors. Ardsley: Transnational Publishers.
  40. Ginsburg, T., & Chen, A. H. Y. (2009). Administrative Law and Governance in Asia.
  41. Ginsburg, T., & Chen, A. H. Y. (2003). Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases.
  42. Gudynas, E. (2009). La ecología política del giro biocéntrico en la nueva Constitución de Ecuador. Revista Estudios Sociales, 32, 34-47.
  43. Hasebe, Y. (2003). Constitutional Borrowing and Political Theory. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1, 224-243.
  44. Hernández, A. F. (2003). Globalization and Legal Education in Latin America: Issues for Law and Development in the 21st Century. Penn State International Law Review, 21.
  45. Hirschl, R. (2014). Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  46. Hobbes, T. (2003). Leviatán. Buenos Aires: Editorial Lozada.
  47. Hoecke M. v., & Warrington, M. (1998) Legal Cultures, Legal Paradigms and Legal Doctrine: Towards a New Model for Comparative Law. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 47, 495-536.
  48. Hoeflich, M. H. (1986). Law and Geometry: Legal Science from Leibniz to Langdell. American Journal of Legal History, 30.
  49. Holmes, O. W. (1897). The Path Of The Law. Harvard Law Review, 10.
  50. Hurtado, L. F. P. (2010). Content, Structure, and Growth of Mexican Legal Education. Journal of Legal Education, 59(4).
  51. Kahn, P. (1999). The Cultural Study Of Law: Reconstructing Legal Scholarship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  52. Kahn, P. (2000). Law and Love: The Trials of King Lear. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  53. Kahn, P. (2008). Sacred Violence: Torture, Terror, and Sovereignty. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  54. Kahn, P. (2011). Politicaltheology: Four New Chapters Of Sovereignty. New York: Columbia University Press.
  55. Kelemen R. D., & E. C. Sibbitt. (2004). The Globalization of American Law. International Organization, 58, 103–136.
  56. Koskenniemi, M. (2001). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  57. Laing, E. A. (1974). Revolution in Latin American Legal Education: The Colombian Experience. Lawyer Of The Americas, 6.
  58. Langer, M. (2004). From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure. Harvard International Law Journal, 45(1).
  59. Legrand, P. (1997). The Impossibility of ‘Legal Transplants’. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 4.
  60. Leiter, B. (2010). Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What Is the Issue?. Legal Theory, 16(2), 111-133.
  61. Leiter, B. (2013). Why Legal Positivism (Again)?. University of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 442. Disponible en SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=232301.
  62. Lemaire, GG. (2001). The Orient in Western Art. Cologne: Könemann, 2001.
  63. Lillis T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. London: Routledge.
  64. Llewellyn, K. (1931). Some Realism about Realism – Responding to Dean Pound. Harvard Law Review, 44.
  65. Llewellyn, K. N. (1949). Law and the Social Sciences. Harvard Law Review, 62(8), 1286-1305.
  66. Locke, J. (1991). Dos ensayos sobre el gobierno civil. Buenos Aires: Espasa Calpe.
  67. Macchiavello, A. C. (2008). Una experiencia de reforma curricular: el plan de estudios de Derecho de la Universidad Diego Portales. Derecho y Democracia – 15 Cuadernos Unimetanos, 2, 33-43.
  68. Madrazo, A. (2008). From revelation to creation: the origins of text and doctrine in the civil law tradition. I Mexican Law Review, 1.
  69. Maisel, P. (2008). The Role of U.S. Law Faculty in Developing Countries: Striving for Effective Cross-Cultural Collaboration. Clinical Law Review, 14.
  70. Mattei, U. (1994). Why the Wind Changed: Intellectual Leadership in Western Law. American Journal of Comparative Law, 42.
  71. Mattei, U. (1997). Three Patterns of Law: Taxonomy and Change in the World's Legal Systems. American Journal of Comparative Law, 45.
  72. Mattei, U. (1998). An Opportunity Not to Be Missed: The Future of Comparative Law in The United States. American Journal of Comparative Law, 48.
  73. Mattei, U. (2003). A Theory of Imperial Law: A Study on U.S. Hegemony and the Latin Resistance. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 10.
  74. McIlwain, C. H. (1940). Constitutionalism: Ancient and Modern. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  75. Medina, D. L. (2004). Teoria Impura Del Derecho. Bogotá: Editorial Legis.
  76. Mendes, C. H. (2008). La escuela de Derecho de São Paulo de la Fundación Getulio Vargas Caio Farah Rodriguez Joaquim Falcão. Derecho y Democracia – 15 Cuadernos Unimetanos, 16-32.
  77. Merryman, J. H. (1977). Comparative Law and Social Change: On the Origins, Style, Decline, and Revival of the Law and Development Movement. American Journal of Comparative Law, 25, 484–489.
  78. Merryman, J. H., & Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2007). The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction To The Legal Systems Of Europe And Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  79. Mickelson, K. (2000). South, North, International Environmental Law, and International Environmental Lawyers. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 11.
  80. Mickelson, K. (2009). Beyond a Politics of the Possible? South-North Relations and Climate Justice. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 10, 411-423.
  81. Mirow, M. C. (2001). Borrowing Private Law in Latin America: Andres Bello’s Use of the “Code Napoleon” in Drafting the Chilean Civil Code. Louisiana Law Review, 61(2), 290-329.
  82. Mirow, M. C. (2004). Latin American Law: A History Of Private Law And Institutions In Spanish America. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  83. Mirow, M. C. (2005). The Code Napoleon: Buried but Ruling in Latin America. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 33, 179-194.
  84. Monateri. P. G., & Samuel, G. (2006). La Invención del Derecho Privado. Bogotá: Universidad de Los Andes.
  85. Morin, FJ., & Gold, R. (2013). An Integrated Model of Legal Transplantation: The Diffusion of Intellectual Property Law in Developing Countries. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2335531
  86. Morris, R. C., & Spivak, G. C. (2010). Can the Subaltern Speak?: Reflections on the History of an Idea. New York: Columbia University Press.
  87. Murillo, M. V. (2005). Partisanship Amidst Convergence: The Politics of Labor Reform in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 37(4), 44-458.
  88. Mutua, M. W. (2000). What is Twail?. American Society of International Law, Proceedings of the 94th Annual Meeting, 31-39.
  89. Nkrumah, K. (1962). Law in Africa. African Law Journal, 6.
  90. Nolutshungu, S. C. (1993). Constitutionalism in Africa: Some Conclusions. In D. Greenberg, et al. (Eds.) Constitutionalism and Democracy: Transitions in the Contemporary World.
  91. Olea, H. (2013). El Formalismo Jurídico, La Educación Jurídica Y La Práctica Profesional Del Derecho En Latinoamérica. Derecho Y Pueblo Mapuche, Universidad Diego Portales, Chile.
  92. Osiatynski, W. (2003). Paradoxes of Constitutional Borrowing. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1, 244-268.
  93. Pargendler, M. (2012). The Rise and Decline of Legal Families. American Journal of Comparative Law, 60(4).
  94. Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2005). Rule of Law and Layers in Latin America. Annals Of The American Acamedy Of Political And Social Science, 603(1).
  95. Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2011). Legal Education in Late Twentieth-Century Latin America. In L. Friedman, R. Pérez-Perdomo, & M. Gómez (Eds.), Law In Many Societies (p. 63).
  96. Posner, R. (1973). Economic Analysis Of Law. Boston: Little Brown.
  97. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  98. Rawls, J. (1996). Liberalismo Político. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  99. Ritttich, K. (2006). The Future of Law and Development: Second-Generation Reforms and the Incorporation of the Social. In D. Trubek and A. Santos (Eds.) The New Law and Economic Development, (pp. 203–352). Cambridge University Press.
  100. Rodriguez, C. F., & Falcão, J. (2008). O projeto da escola de Direito do Rio de Janeiro da FGV. Derecho y Democracia – 15 Cuadernos Unimetanos, 44-50.
  101. Rosenkrantz, C. F. (2003). Against Borrowings and Other Nonauthoritative Uses of Foreign Law. International Journal of Consitutional Law, 1(2), 269-95.
  102. Rosenthal, D. A. (1982). Orientalism: the near east in French painting, 1800-1880. Rochester: Memorial Art Gallery of the University of Rochester.
  103. Roy, A. (2008). Postcolonial Theory and Law: A Critical Introduction. Adelaide Law Review, 29(1/2).
  104. Ruskola, T. (2002). Legal Orientalism, Michigan Law Review, 101(1), 179-234.
  105. Santos, B. S. (1995). Three Metaphors for a New Conception of Law: The Frontier, the Baroque and the South. Law & Society Review, 29, 569-584.
  106. Scheppele, K. L. (2003). Aspirational and Aversive Constitutionalism: The Case for Studying Cross-constitutional Influence through Negative Models. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1, 296-324.
  107. Schmidhauser, J. R. (1989). Power, Legal Imperialism, and Dependency. Law & Society Review. 23(5), 857-878.
  108. Schmidhauser, J. R. (1992). Legal Imperialism: Its Enduring Impact on Colonial and Post-Colonial Judicial Systems. International Political Science, 13(3).
  109. Spamann, H. (2010). Contemporary Legal Transplants - Legal Families and the Diffusion of (Corporate) Law. Brigham Young University Law Review, (6), 1813-1877.
  110. Spector, H. (2008). The academic study of law in Argentina. Derecho y Democracia – 15 Cuadernos Unimetanos, 6-15.
  111. Steinitz, M. (2009). Internationalized Pro Bono and a New Global Role for Lawyers in the 21st Century: Lessons from Nation Building in Southern Sudan. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 12, 205-240.
  112. Stevens, M. A. (Ed.) (1984). The Orientalists: Delacroix to Matisse: European Painters in North Africa and the Near East. London: Royal Academy of Arts.
  113. Tamanaha, B. Z. (2009). The Primacy of Society and the Failures of Law and Development. St. John's Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Paper No. 09-0172. Disponible en: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1406999
  114. The Association of the Bar of the City of NY. (2002). Report on The Buenos Aires Conference on Pro Bono and Access to Justice, The Committee on Inter-American Affairs.
  115. Toro, B. L. (2003). Las clínicas jurídicas de interés público en Colombia. Retos y posibilidades de una naciente experiencia. In Clínicas de Interés Público y Enseñanza del Derecho (pp. 9-47).
  116. Torres, A. (2007). From Inquisitorial to Accusatory: Colombia and Guatemala's Legal Transition 2. Law and Justice in the Americas Working Paper Series, Paper no. 4. Disponible en http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ljawps/4.
  117. Trubek, D. M. (2006). The "Rule of Law" in Development Assistance: Past, Present, and Future. In D. M. Trubek & A. Santos (Eds.), The New Law And Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  118. Trubek, D. M., & Santos, A. (2006). Introduction: The Third Moment in Law and Develop- ment Theory and the Emergence of a New Critical Practice. In D. M. Trubek, & A. Santos (Eds.), The New Law And Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (pp. 2-3). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  119. Trubek, D., & Galanter, M. (1974). Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Some Reflectionson on the Crisis in Law and Development Studies. Wisconsin Law Review, 4, 1062-1095.
  120. Tully, J. (1997). Strange multiplicity: Constitucionalism in an Age of Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  121. Tushnet, M. (1999). The Possibilities of Comparative Constitutional Law. Yale Law Journal, 108(6), 1225-1239.
  122. Vargas, J. M. (2008). La reforma a la enseñanza del derecho en la Universidad de Los Andes. Derecho y Democracia – 15 Cuadernos Unimetanos, 63-90.
  123. Vargas, J. M. (2009). Educación jurídica en Latinoamérica: dificultades curriculares para promover los temas de interés público y justicia social. El Otro Derecho, 38, 29-42.
  124. Vargas, J. M. (2010). The Current State Of Legal Education Reform In Latin America: A Critical Appraisal. Journal of Legal Education, 59.
  125. White, L. E. (2000). Pro Bono or Partnership: Rethinking Lawyers’ Public Service Obligations for a New Millennium. Journal of Legal Education, 50, 134-146.
  126. Wiegand, W. (1996). Americanization of Law: Reception or Convergence. In L. M. Friedman, & H. N. Scheiber (Eds), Legal Culture and the Legal Profession. Boulder: Westview Press.
  127. Wilson, R. J. (2004). Training for Justice: The Global Reach Of Clinical Legal Education. Penn State International Law Review, 22, 421-431.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.