Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Articles

Vol. 9 (2022): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito

VIEWS ON RESTRICTIVE MEASURES AMONG BRAZILIAN LAWYERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK: AN EX-PLORATORY ANALYSIS FROM RAPID RESEARCH

DOI
https://doi.org/10.19092/reed.v10.642
Submitted
September 3, 2021
Published
2022-08-15

Abstract

COVID-19 has had deep impacts on the lives of individuals, organizations, and polities around the globe. Legal professionals and institutions were not absent from this story. Governments adopted different approaches to deal with the pandemic, which – at a time when social relations have become ever more judicialized – inevitably triggered legal disputes. Central to these disputes were restrictive measures such as lockdown for non-essential businesses, shelter-in-place and stay-at-home orders for communities, and compulsory quarantine for infected individuals. These disputes were further entangled with political conflict and polarization, as the case of Brazil under President Jair Bolsonaro well exemplifies. Against such backdrop, this article investigates: Did Brazilian legal professionals view those restrictive measures and the power of government entities to enact them to be consistent with ‘the law’? What explains variation in their views? By exploring data from rapid research carried out during the pandemic outbreak in Brazil, this article points to the role of variables such as pandemic understandings and experiences, political orientation and attitudes, and the nexus between legal knowledge and the State in shaping the attitude of such population. The implications to studies on legal professionals, pandemics, and the rule of law in Brazil and beyond are discussed.

References

  1. Abbot, E. B. (2007). Law, Federalism, the Constitution, and Control of Pandemic Flu. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 9(2), 185-212. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/aplpj9&i=191
  2. https://heinonline.org/HOL/PrintRequest?handle=hein.journals/aplpj9&collection=journals&div=12&id=191&print=section&sction=12
  3. Allcott, H., Boxell, L., Conway, J., Gentzkow, M., Thaler, M., & Yang, D. (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. J Public Econ, 191, 104254. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254
  4. Archibugi, D., & Bizzarri, K. I. M. (2004). The Global Governance of Communicable Diseases: The Case for Vaccine R&D. Law & Policy, 27(1), 33-51. doi:https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2004.00190.x
  5. Aron, J., & Muellbauer, J. (29 September 2020). The US excess mortality rate from COVID-19 is substantially worse than Europe’s. Retrieved from https://voxeu.org/article/us-excess-mortality-rate-covid-19-substantially-worse-europe-s
  6. Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., . . . Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460-471. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
  7. Cakanlar, A., Trudel, R., & White, K. (2020). Political Ideology and the Perceived Impact of Coronavirus Prevention Behaviors for the Self and Others. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research. doi:10.1086/711834
  8. Calvillo, D. P., Ross, B. J., Garcia, R. J. B., Smelter, T. J., & Rutchick, A. M. (2020). Political Ideology Predicts Perceptions of the Threat of COVID-19 (and Susceptibility to Fake News About It). Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(8), 1119-1128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620940539
  9. Calvo, E., & Ventura, T. (2021). Will I Get COVID-19? Partisanship, Social Media Frames, and Perceptions of Health Risk in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, 1-2. doi:10.1017/lap.2021.17
  10. Christensen, S. R., Pilling, E. B., Eyring, J. B., Dickerson, G., Sloan, C. D., & Magnusson, B. M. (2020). Political and personal reactions to COVID-19 during initial weeks of social distancing in the United States. PloS one, 15(9), e0239693. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239693
  11. Clinton, J., Cohen, J., Lapinski, J., & Trussler, M. (2021). Partisan pandemic: How partisanship and public health concerns affect individuals’ social mobility during COVID-19. Science Advances, 7(2), eabd7204. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd7204
  12. Coleman, D. L., & Rosoff, P. M. (2020). The enhanced danger of physicians’ off-label prescribing during a public health emergency. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1). doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa031
  13. Doerr, M., & Wagner, J. K. (2020). Research ethics in a pandemic: considerations for the use of research infrastructure and resources for public health activities. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1). doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa028
  14. Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (1998). The common place of law : stories from everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  15. Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics. Political Psychology, 38, 127-150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394
  16. Galanter, M. (1974). Why the "Haves" Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review, 9(1), 95-160. doi:10.2307/3053023
  17. Gollwitzer, A., Martel, C., Brady, W. J., Pärnamets, P., Freedman, I. G., Knowles, E. D., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1186-1197. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7
  18. Granfield, R. (2007). The Meaning of Pro Bono: Institutional Variations in Professional Obligations among Lawyers. Law & Society Review, 41(1), 113-146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00293.x
  19. Haltinner, K., & Sarathchandra, D. (2017). Tea Party Health Narratives and Belief Polarization: the Journey to Killing Grandma. AIMS public health, 4(6), 557-578. doi:10.3934/publichealth.2017.6.557
  20. Heinz, J. P. (2005). Urban lawyers : the new social structure of the bar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  21. Heinz, J. P., & Laumann, E. O. (1994). Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.
  22. Hersh, E. D., & Goldenberg, M. N. (2016). Democratic and Republican physicians provide different care on politicized health issues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 113(42), 11811-11816. doi:10.1073/pnas.1606609113
  23. Hirschl, R. (2008a). The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 93-118. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.183906
  24. Hirschl, R. (2008b). The Judicialization of Politics. In (Vol. 1): Oxford University Press.
  25. Jacobs, L. A. (2007). Rights and Quarantine During the SARS Global Health Crisis: Differentiated Legal Consciousness in Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Toronto. Law & Society Review, 41(3), 511-552. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00313.x
  26. Jerry, R. H., II. (2020). COVID-19: responsibility and accountability in a world of rationing. Journal of Law and the Biosciences. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa076
  27. Klug, H. (2012). Access to Medicines and the Transformation of the South African State: Exploring the Interactions of Legal and Policy Changes in Health, Intellectual Property, Trade, and Competition Law in the Context of South Africa's HIV/AIDS Pandemic. Law & Social Inquiry, 37(2), 297-329. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.2011.01268.x
  28. Knoppers, B. M., Beauvais, M. J. S., Joly, Y., Zawati, M. n. H., Rousseau, S., Chassé, M., & Mooser, V. (2020). Modeling consent in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1). doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa020
  29. Largent, E. A. (2016). EBOLA and FDA: reviewing the response to the 2014 outbreak, to find lessons for the future. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 3(3), 489-537. doi:10.1093/jlb/lsw046
  30. Levitsky, S., & Zibblat, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. New York: Crown.
  31. Levitsky, S. R. (2013). Integrating Law and Health Policy. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 9(1), 33-50. doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-133949
  32. Mameli, P. (2000). Managing the HIV/AIDS Pandemic: Paving a Path into the Future of International Law and Organization. Law & Policy, 22(2), 203-224. doi:10.1111/1467-9930.00091
  33. Mariner, W. K., Annas, G. J., & Parmet, W. E. (2009). Pandemic Preparedness: A Return to the Rule of Law Symposium: Health Law Professors Conference. Drexel Law Review, 1(2), 341-382. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/drexel1&i=347
  34. https://heinonline.org/HOL/PrintRequest?handle=hein.journals/drexel1&col ection=journals&div=17&id=347&print=section&sction=17
  35. Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. democracy: why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  36. Nelson, R. L., & Trubek, D. M. (1992). Arenas of Professionalism: The Professional Ideologies of Lawyers in Collective and Workplace Contexts.
  37. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
  38. Parmet, W. (2011). Pandemics, Populism and the Role of Law in the H1N1 Vaccine Campaign. Journal of health law, 4, 7.
  39. Pozen, D. E., & Scheppele, K. L. (2020). Executive Underreach, in Pandemics and Otherwise. American Journal of International Law, 114(4), 608-617. doi:10.1017/ajil.2020.59
  40. Redlener, I., Sachs, J. D., Hansen, S., & Hupert, N. (October 21, 2020). 130,000 – 210,000 Avoidable COVID-19 Deaths – and Counting – in the U.S. Retrieved from https://ncdp.columbia.edu/custom-content/uploads/2020/10/Avoidable-COVID-19-Deaths-US-NCDP.pdf
  41. Seron, C. (1996). The Business of Practicing Law: The Work Lives of Solo and Small-Firm Attorneys. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  42. Simpson, B. (2020). Mass Hysteria, Manufacturing Crisis and the Legal Reconstruction of Acceptable Exercise during a Pandemic. Leisure Sciences, 1-7. doi:10.1080/01490400.2020.1774002
  43. Snyder, T. (2018). The road to unfreedom: Russia, Europe, America. New York: Tim Duggan Books.
  44. Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside Bias, Rational Thinking, and Intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 259-264. doi:10.1177/0963721413480174
  45. Tate, C. N., & Vallinder, T. r. (Eds.). (1995). The global expansion of judicial power. New York: New York University Press.
  46. Thomson, S., & Ip, E. C. (2020). COVID-19 emergency measures and the impending authoritarian pandemic. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1). doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa064
  47. Tremblay-Huet, S., McMorrow, T., Wiebe, E., Kelly, M., Hennawy, M., & Sum, B. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical assistance in dying in Canada and the relationship of public health laws to private understandings of the legal order. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1). doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa087
  48. Vasquez Reyes, M. (2020). The Disproportional Impact of COVID-19 on African Americans. Health and human rights, 22(2), 299-307. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33390715
  49. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7762908/
  50. Weait, M. (2013). Unsafe law: health, rights and the legal response to HIV. International Journal of Law in Context, 9(4), 535-564. doi:10.1017/S1744552313000293
  51. White, M. D., & Fradella, H. F. (2020). Policing a Pandemic: Stay-at-Home Orders and What they Mean for the Police. American journal of criminal justice : AJCJ, 1-16. doi:10.1007/s12103-020-09538-0
  52. Woolhandler, S., Himmelstein, D. U., Ahmed, S., Bailey, Z., Bassett, M. T., Bird, M., . . . Venkataramani, A. (2021). Public policy and health in the Trump era. The Lancet, 397(10275), 705-753. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32545-9
  53. Yakovi Gan-Or, N. (2020). Going solo: the law and ethics of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1). doi:10.1093/jlb/lsaa079

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.