This article discusses questions that are relevant to the epistemology of qualitative research. In order to do so, the presumed dichotomy between qualitative and quantitative research is discussed and challenged. According to the author, the similarities between these methods are more relevant than its differences. Both methods strive to describe the social reality and thus have the same epistemological basis, even though they emphasize different questions. To shed light in such dichotomy, the author explores the origins of epistemology as a discipline and its philosophical character. Finally, the particularities and advantages of qualitative research are discussed, especially ethnography and field research, through an analysis of some of its main aspects for observing social reality: its focus on the point of view of the actor; the observation of the everyday world and the full and thick description.
References
Abbott, A. (1992). What do cases do? Some notes on activity in sociological analysis. In C. C. Ragin & H. S. Becker (Eds.). What Is A Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry (p. 53‐82). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Asad, T. (1986). The Concept of Cultural Translation in British Social Anthropology. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography (p.141‐164). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Becker, H. S. (1967). Whose Side Are We On? Social Problems 14 (Winter), 239‐247.
Becker, H. S. (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Becker, H. S. (1986). Doing Things Together. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Becker, H. S.; Geer, B.; Hughes, E. C. & Strauss, A. L. (1961). Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bittner, E. & Garfinkel H. (1967). ‘Good’ Organizational Reasons for ‘Bad’ Organizational Records. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.
Burroughs, W. (1966). Naked Lunch. New York: Grove Press.
De Quincey, T. (1971). Confessions of an English Opium Eater. Aletha Hayter (Ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Diesing, P. (1971). Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Drake, S. C. & Cayton, H. (1945). Black Metropolis. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
Geertz, C. (1974). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2 ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lieberson, S. (1992). Einstein, Renoir, and Greeley: Some Thoughts About Evidence in Sociology. American Sociological Review, 57, 1‐15.
Ludlow, F. H. (1975). The Hashish Eater. M. Horowitz (Ed). San Francisco: Level Press.
Mercer, J. (1973). Labeling the Mentally Retarded. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Peneff, J. (1988). The Observers Observed: French Survey Researchers at Work. Social Problems, 35, 520‐535.
Platt, J. (artigo inédito). Theory and Practice in the Development of Sociological Methodology.
Polya, G. (1954). Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Redfield, R. (1941). The Folk Culture of Yucatan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
Schutz, A. (1962). Collected Papers: Volume I, The Problem of Social Reality. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
Whyte, W. F. (1981). Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum (3 ed). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
