While legal researchers’ skepticism about much of what is on offer under the name of theory is well grounded, there are nevertheless theoretical resources that can very much benefit empirical researchers. Neither legal philosophy nor grand European sociology of law are particularly helpful, and in many respects these traditions constitute obstacles to concrete analyses of legal processes. But fortunately, today, there are other sources of theoretical and methodological inspiration. Here I present a small part of my own recent contribution to the project of revising ‘theory’ in a way that is more helpful to legal and empirical researchers than traditional philosophy and sociology.
References
Valverde, M. (2015). Chronotopes of law: jurisdiction, scale, and governance. London: Routledge.
Bakhtin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Todorov, T. & Bakhtin, M. (1984). The dialogical principle. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Boltanski, L. (2014). Mysteries and conspiracies: detective stories, spy novels and the making of modern societies, transl. Catherine Porter. London: Polity.
Santos, B. de S. (1987). Law: a map of misreading: towards a postmodern conception of law. Journal of Law and Society, 14(3), 279-302.
Li, T. (2007). Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society, 36(2), 263-293.
