Ir para o menu de navegação principal Ir para o conteúdo principal Ir para o rodapé


v. 4 n. 3 (2017): Revista de Estudos Empíricos em Direito

Perceptions and attitudes with regard to public international law: empirical evidence from law students in the city of São Paulo

novembro 21, 2016


This article empirically examines, by means of a survey conducted at four universities in São Paulo, two issues related to the teaching of international law in Brazil: (1) what law students think of the discipline as a material branch of the law (its effectiveness, legitimacy etc.) and (2) what they think of the discipline as a component of the law school curriculum. The first part draws upon the semiological concept of “myth” in order to paint a picture of students’ views about the place of international law in the world, as well as upon quantitative data to assess their understandings about compliance with international norms. The second part, which also relies on quantitative and qualitative data, describes students’ ideas about how international law should be taught (if at all). The responses paint a picture of mild student scepticism and dissatisfaction with teaching methods that invite a number of questions for reflection, which are raised in the final part. 


  1. Anzilotti, D. (1929). Cours de Droit International. Paris: Sirey.
  2. Austin, J. (1998). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. Indianopolis: Hackett.
  3. Barthes, R. (1970). Mythologies. Paris: Seuil.
  4. Brazilian Bar Association. (2009). Provimento Nº 136, de 19 de outubro de 2009. Available at: <>. Accessed on 18 May 2016.
  5. Brierly, J. (1944). The Outlook for International Law. Oxford: The Claredon Press.
  6. Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: the basics. New York: Routledge.
  7. Cunha, J. (2005). Direitos Humanos e Justiciabilidade: pesquisa no Tribunal de Justiça do Rio de Janeiro. SUR – Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos, 2(3), 138-172.
  8. Epstein, L.; Martin, A. (2014). An Introduction to Empirical Legal Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Focarelli, C. (2012). International Law as a Social Construct. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Folha de São Paulo. (2013). Ranking Universitário Folha – Direito (2013). Available at: <> (in Portuguese). Accessed on 20 March 2016.
  11. Foucalt, M. (1994). Dits et écrits, 1954-1988. Paris: Gallimard. Tome III: 1976-1979.
  12. Goldstein, Jan. (1984). Foucault among the Sociologists: the ‘Disciplines’ and the history of the professions. History and Theory, 23(2), 170-192.
  13. Grotius, H. (1925). The Law of War and Peace. Translation Francis Kelsey. New York: Carnegie Classics.
  14. Kennedy, D. (2002). The Critique of Rights in Critical Legal Studies (pp. 178-227). In W. Brown, J. Halley (Ed.) Left Legalism/Left Critique. Durham: Duke University Press.
  15. Keohane, R. (1982). The Demand for International Regimes. International Organization, 36(2), .
  16. Klabbers, J., Piiparinen, T. (2013). Normative Pluralism: An Exploration (pp. 13-34). In J. Klabbers, T. Piiparinen (Ed.) Normative Pluralism and International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Koskenniemi, M. (2005). From Apology to Utopia: the structure of international legal argument. Reissue with new epilogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Koskenniemi, M. (2007). The Fate of Public International Law: between technique and politics. The Modern Law Review, 70(1), 1-30.
  19. Lauterpacht, H. (1933). The Function of Law in the International Community. Oxford: Claredon Press.
  20. Mearsheimer, J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5-49.
  21. Miéville, C. (2005). Between Equal Rights: a Marxist theory of international law. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
  22. Morgenthau, H. (2005). Politics among Nations: the struggle for power and peace. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  23. Passmore, J. (1985). Recent Philosophers. London: Duckworth.
  24. Perreau-Sassine, A. (2010). Immanuel Kant on International Law (pp. 53-75). In S. Besson, J. Tasioulas (Ed.), The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Posner, E.; Sykes, A. (2012). International Law and the Limits of Macroeconomic Cooperation. Southern California Law Review, 86, 1025-1078.
  26. Saussure, F. (1995). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
  27. Unger, R. (2005). Uma Nova Faculdade de Direito no Brasil. Cadernos FGV Direito Rio, 1, 113-131.
  28. Weber, C. (2010). International Relations Theory: a critical introduction. New York: Routledge.


Não há dados estatísticos.